A LOOK AT THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL STATE OF AFFAIRS RECOGNIZED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF BRAZIL

Giliarde B.  A. C. V. Nascimento e Gama

doi:10.47820/recima21.v4i1.2624

Autores

Giliarde B. A. C. V. Nascimento e Gama Universidade Federal do Tocantins

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47820/recima21.v4i1.2624

Palavras-chave:

factors of multiple orders and touching the national Penitentiary

Resumo

Approaching factors of multiple orders and touching the national Penitentiary and Prison System is to seek to understand the roots and constraints of the formal and legal structure assumed by penal establishments that, today, are recognized as an “Unconstitutional State of Things” due to decision, in 2020, in the Argument of Non-compliance with Fundamental Precept n. 347 at the Honorable Court of the Federative Republic of Brazil. First of all, here we have bibliographical research (supported by literature of political and legal classics, eg, Immanuel Kant, Norberto Bobbio), documental ( vg Constitutions of 1824 and 1988, angular and underlyingly supported) and jurisprudential (Arguição de Descumprimento of Fundamental Precept - ADPF n. 347 sustained in a jusphilosophical construct), with a qualitative and interdisciplinary focus, on the recognition of the "Unconstitutional State of Things" to fall on the Prison System in Brazil with a view to critically and reflexively understanding the prison environment and the vectors that affirm the “state of affairs”.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Giliarde B. A. C. V. Nascimento e Gama, Universidade Federal do Tocantins

PhD student in Regional Development at the Federal University of Tocantins –UFT and Master Professor of Law at the State University of Tocantins -UNITINS

Referências

ANDRADE, BA de; TEIXEIRA, MC The unconstitutional state of affairs: an analysis of ADPF 347. Revista do Curso de Direito da Faculdade de Humanidades e Direito, v. 13, no. 13, p. 85-121, 2016.

ARENDT, Hannah. The human condition. Ed. 13 a.m. _ São Paulo: University Forensics, 2016.

ARENDT, Hannah. Men in dark times. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2008.

BOBBIO, N. Dictionary of Politics. Brasília: UnB, 1992.

BOBBIO, Norberto. The Age of Rights. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 1992.

BRAZIL. Law 7210, of July 1984. Establishes the Criminal Execution Law. Available at: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l7210.htm . Accessed on August 1, 2021.

BRAZIL. MANAGEMENT REPORT: supervision of the monitoring and inspection department of the prison system and the system for implementing socio-educational measures - DMF. National Council of Justice – CNJ, 2017. Available at:. Accessed on: 06 Jun. from 2021.

BRAZIL. Report: national survey of penitentiary information. National Penitentiary Department. Available at: http://depen.gov.br/DEPEN/depen/sisdepen/infopen. Accessed on: 06 Jun. from 2021.

CAMPOS, Carlos Alexandre de Azevedo. Unconstitutional State of Affairs. Ed. 2 a . Pituba: Juspodivm, 2019.

CANOTILHO, José Joaquim Gomes . Rule of Law. Fundação Mário Soares.Lisbon: Radiva Produções, Ida, 1st Ed. 1999.

CASTEÑEDA, Ilya Miriam Hoyos. The legal concept of persona. Pamplona: Editions, University of Navarra, 1989.

CELLARD, A. Documentary analysis. In: POUPART, J. et al. Qualitative research: epistemological and methodological approaches. Petropolis, Voices, 2008.

CUNHA, Rogerio Sanches. Criminal Law Manual: general part. Ed. 10 a.m. _ Pituba: Juspodivm, 2021.

DEMO, Peter. Research and construction of knowledge. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 1996.

DUARTE, FC Devices for the clinical listening of suffering at work: Between the clinic of cooperation and pathologies. Dissertation (Master in Social Psychology of Work and Organizations) - University of Brasília. 142f, Brasilia, 2014.

DWORKIN, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Trans. Luis Carlos Borges. 2nd ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2005.

GERHARDT, TE; SILVEIRA, DT Research methods. Porto Alegre: Editora da UFRGS, 2009.

GILL, Antonio Carlos. How to prepare research projects. São Paulo: Atlas, 1991.

GILL, Antonio Carlos. Social research methods and techniques. 6. ed. Publisher Sao Paulo. Atlas, 2008.

GILL, Antonio Carlos. Social research methods and techniques. São Paulo: Atlas, 1999.

GOGLIANO, Daisy. Private personality rights. Thesis (Doctorate in Law) – Faculty of Law, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, 1982.

JUNIOR, CNK (2012). Subject of Law and Capitalism. Thesis (Doctorate in Law) – Faculty of Law. University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo.

JUNIOR, CNK Subject of Law and Capitalism. 2012. 177 f. Thesis (Doctorate in Law) – Faculty of Law. University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo.

KANT, E. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Translation Paulo Quintela. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2004. 117 p. (Philosophical Texts).

MENDES, AM Analytical Listening to Suffering and the clinician's know-how at work. In: Work & Suffering: clinical practices and policies. Mendes, AM (Org.). Curitiba: Juruá, 2014.

MINAYO, Maria Cecília de Souza. The knowledge challenge. So Paulo: Hucitec, 1993.

MIRANDA, Rafael de Souza. Penal Execution Manual: theory and practice. Ed. 4 a.m. _ Pituba: Juspodivm, 2022.

PENNA, Bernardo Schmidt. More of Brazilian-style judicial activism: analysis of the unconstitutional state of affairs and the decision in ADPF 347. Revista Pensamento Jurídico, v. 11, no. 1, p. 9-19, 2017.

VASCONCELOS, Eduardo Mourao. Complexity and interdisciplinary research: epistemology and operative methodology. Petrópolis, RJ: Voices, 2002.