CONCILIATORY DEMANDS IN ACCESS TO HEALTH GOODS AND SERVICES: SCOPE REVIEW PROTOCOL

Abstract

Objective: to map the existing literature on the production of knowledge and flow about the procedures in conciliatory judicial demands for health goods and services and digital accessibility. Review method: scoping review protocol according to the Joanna Briggs Institute method. Published and unpublished bibliographic materials will be considered, according to the following inclusion criteria: reports on the production of knowledge and flow for procedures in conciliatory judicial demands of health goods and services and digital accessibility (concept) in health conciliation chambers in Brazil and abroad (context). A detailed and individual search strategy will be used for each database: Lilacs (BVS), Medline (PubMed), Embase and Scopus. Two reviewers will screen the titles and abstracts, read the full texts and extract data from the included material. Presentation and interpretation of results: the results included in the scope review proposal will be classified into conceptual analysis categories based on thematic categorical analysis (Bardin's content analysis).

Author Biographies

Thiago Ibiapina Coelho

Advogado, Pós-graduado em Direito Administrativo. Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE).

Thereza Maria Magalhães Moreira

Enfermeira e Advogada. Pós-Doutora em Saúde Pública. Universidade Estadual do Ceará (UECE).

References

Schulze CJ, Gebran Neto JP. Direito à saúde. Porto Alegre: Verbo Jurídico; 2015.

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2018; 69(7):467–73. https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-0850

Silva DMF, Jorge MSB. Mental health care strategies of health professionals in times of COVID-19: scope review protocol. BJHR. 2021; 4(4). https://doi.org/10.34119/bjhrv4n4-270

Ferreira SMR; Retondario A; Tanikawa L. Protocolo de revisão de escopo e revisão sistemática na área de alimentos. Visão Acadêmica. 2021; 22(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/acd.v22i2.79568

Araújo W. C. O. Recuperação da informação em saúde: construção, modelos e estratégias. Conv, Ciênc. Inform. 2020; 3(2):100-34. https://doi.org/10.33467/conci.v3i2.13447

Joanna Briggs Institute. The Joanna Briggs Institute. JBI for evidence synthesis. JBI; 2021.

Botelho RG, Oliveira CC. Literaturas branca e cinzenta: uma revisão conceitual. Ci.Inf, Brasília. 2017; 44(3):501-13. https://doi.org/10.18225/ci.inf..v44i3.1804

QSR International. O que é o Nvivo?. QSR International; 2020.

Bardin, L. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70; 2011.

How to Cite

Ibiapina Coelho, T., & Maria Magalhães Moreira, T. (2022). CONCILIATORY DEMANDS IN ACCESS TO HEALTH GOODS AND SERVICES: SCOPE REVIEW PROTOCOL. RECIMA21 - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar - ISSN 2675-6218, 3(10), e3102051. https://doi.org/10.47820/recima21.v3i10.2051