TAX AVOIDANCE IN MOTOR VEHICLE TAX (IPVA) AND ITS IMPACTS ON BRAZILIAN FEDERALISM: A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF TAX MOBILITY

Abstract

The Motor Vehicle Property Tax (IPVA) constitutes one of the main sources of tax revenue for Brazilian states and is characterized by the legislative autonomy of federative units in defining their tax rates. This feature, although aligned with the foundations of fiscal federalism, results in significant tax heterogeneity, whose effects go beyond the revenue dimension and extend to behavioral, institutional, and socioeconomic aspects. This study aims to analyze, from a theoretical and qualitative perspective, the impacts resulting from this variation in tax rates. The research is based on a bibliographic review grounded in public finance theory, fiscal federalism, tax competition, and the theory of externalities. The results indicate that the absence of tax harmonization favors fiscal mobility, encourages tax avoidance practices, and compromises the revenue efficiency of states. Furthermore, it is evident that the non-earmarked nature of the IPVA limits its effectiveness as a public policy instrument aimed at road infrastructure and the mitigation of environmental impacts. It is concluded that the current model presents structural weaknesses that require greater federative coordination and institutional revision.

Author Biographies

Ruan Henrick Ferreira Santos, Faculdde dos Vales

Bachelor’s degree in Accounting, with a postgraduate degree in Controllership and Finance.

Michele Borges da Silva Souza , Uniabeu-RJ

Bachelor’s degree in Accounting.

Vera Lídia Guerra Ferreira, Universidade Pitágoras Unopar Anhanguera

Bachelor’s degree in Accounting.

References

AFONSO, José Roberto; CASTRO, Kleber Pacheco. Federalismo fiscal e desigualdades regionais no Brasil. Revista de Economia Contemporânea, [S. l.], v. 24, n. 2, 2020.

ALLINGHAM, Michael G.; SANDMO, Agnar. Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, v. 1, n. 3-4, p. 323–338, 1972. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0047272772900102 Acesso em: 25 mar. 2026.

BANCO MUNDIAL. Transport and Climate Change Global Report. Washington, 2022.

BIRD, Richard M.; SLACK, Enid. Fiscal aspects of metropolitan governance. IMFG Papers, n. 1, 2004. Disponível em: https://munkschool.utoronto.ca/imfg Acesso em: 25 mar. 2026.

BIRD, Richard M.; ZOLT, Eric M. Technology and taxation in developing countries: from hand to mouse. National Tax Journal, v. 61, n. 4, p. 791–821, 2008. Disponível em: https://www.ntanet.org Acesso em: 25 mar. 2026.

BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 1988. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm Acesso em: 25 mar. 2026.

BRASIL. Receita Federal do Brasil. Carga Tributária no Brasil 2023. Brasília, 2023.

BRASIL. Tesouro Nacional. Relatório Anual da Dívida Pública e Estatísticas Fiscais. Brasília, 2022.

CRESWELL, John W. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4. ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2014.

DEMO, Pedro. Metodologia do conhecimento científico. São Paulo: Atlas, 2000.

GIL, Antonio Carlos. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 6. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008.

HARADA, Kiyoshi. Direito financeiro e tributário. 25. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2016.

IPEA. Mobilidade urbana e políticas públicas no Brasil: desafios contemporâneos. Brasília, 2023.

LAKATOS, Eva Maria; MARCONI, Marina de Andrade. Fundamentos de metodologia científica. 8. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2017.

LITMAN, Todd. Transportation and environmental policy. Victoria: Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 2013. Disponível em: https://www.vtpi.org Acesso em: 25 mar. 2026.

MUSGRAVE, Richard A. The theory of public finance: a study in public economy. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959.

OATES, Wallace E. Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972.

ORAIR, Rodrigo Octávio; GOBETTI, Sérgio Wulff. Progressividade tributária, redistribuição e federalismo fiscal no Brasil. Texto para Discussão IPEA, Brasília, 2021.

PRUD’HOMME, Rémy. The dangers of decentralization. The World Bank Research Observer, v. 10, n. 2, p. 201–220, 1995. Disponível em: https://academic.oup.com/wbro Acesso em: 25 mar. 2026.

REZENDE, Fernando. Finanças públicas. 2. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2001.

SABBAG, Eduardo. Manual de direito tributário. 12. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2020.

SEVERINO, Antônio Joaquim. Metodologia do trabalho científico. 24. ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 2016.

STIGLITZ, Joseph E. Economics of the public sector. 3. ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2000.

TIEBOUT, Charles M. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, v. 64, n. 5, p. 416–424, 1956. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1826343 Acesso em: 25 mar. 2026.

TORGLER, Benno; SCHNEIDER, Friedrich. Shadow economy, tax morale, governance and institutional quality. Bonn: IZA, 2007. Disponível em: https://www.iza.org Acesso em: 25 mar. 2026.

VARSANO, Ricardo. A guerra fiscal do ICMS: quem ganha e quem perde. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA, 1997. Disponível em: https://www.ipea.gov.br Acesso em: 25 mar. 2026.

WILSON, John D. Theories of tax competition. National Tax Journal, v. 52, n. 2, p. 269–304, 1999. Disponível em: https://www.ntanet.org Acesso em: 25 mar. 2026.

ZODROW, George R. Tax competition and tax coordination in the European Union. International Tax and Public Finance, v. 10, p. 651–671, 2003. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com Acesso em: 25 mar. 2026.

How to Cite

Santos, R. H. F. ., Souza , M. B. da S. ., & Ferreira, V. L. G. (2026). TAX AVOIDANCE IN MOTOR VEHICLE TAX (IPVA) AND ITS IMPACTS ON BRAZILIAN FEDERALISM: A THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF TAX MOBILITY. RECIMA21 - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar - ISSN 2675-6218, 7(4), e747787. https://doi.org/10.47820/recima21.v7i4.7787