MEDIA DEFLUENCE IN THE PERCEPTION OF THE VERACITY OF INFORMATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47820/recima21.v4i1.2495Keywords:
fake news, social networks, misinformationAbstract
Since the end of the 1970s, when the process and invention of digital social networks began until the present day, there has been a constant and growing adherence to these networks, which currently have more than three billion users. Due to the uninterrupted flow of information and consequent dynamism present in social networks, most of its users do not use them only as a form of socialization, but also as a form of data consultation (from the most diverse areas of knowledge) and as an open space for the expression of their beliefs and ideas. However, despite the qualities in relation to greater access to knowledge (given the number of users of social networks and the informality present in these) and the freedom of expression made possible by the networks, there is a very large stage for the dissemination of false news and posts, which implies the question of the growth of the disinformation cycle and the process of sharing fake news. This article carried out a systematic survey, through the base of articles and journals web of science and, subsequently, an analysis of relevant articles (impact factor and citation) seeking to understand the concept of media influence and the factors that lead people to accept certain untruths even when presented with the correct facts.
Downloads
References
AFONSO, Alexandre Soares; CPF:14869915804; HTTP://BUSCATEXTUAL.CNPQ.BR/BUSCATEXTUAL/VISUALIZACV.DO?ID=K4293693E2. Uma análise da utilização das redes sociais em ambientes corporativos. [S. l.], 2010. Disponível em: https://tede.pucsp.br/handle/handle/18269.
ALVES, Alessandra; BARBOSA, Ricardo Rodrigues. Influências e barreiras ao compartilhamento da informação: uma perspectiva teórica. Ciência da Informação, [S. l.], v. 39, n. 2, p. 115–128, 2010. DOI: 10.1590/s0100-19652010000200010.
AMARAL, Ana Laura Pereira; MELO, Jose Airton Mendonça. A importância das mídias sociais para o marketing de relacionamento. Negócios em Projeção, [S. l.], v. 7, n. 2, p. 17–30, 2016. Disponível em: http://revista.faculdadeprojecao.edu.br/index.php/Projecao1/article/viewFile/646/627.
AMERICAN, Scientific; AMERICA, Nature; AMERICAN, Scientific. Darwin ’ s Influence on Modern Thought Author ( s ): Ernst Mayr Source : Scientific American , Vol . 283 , No . 1 ( JULY 2000 ), pp . 78-83 Published by : Scientific American , a division of Nature America , Inc . Stable URL : https://www.jstor.org/stable. [S. l.], v. 283, n. 1, p. 78–83, 2000.
BAILO, Francesco; MEESE, James; HURCOMBE, Edward. The Institutional Impacts of Algorithmic Distribution: Facebook and the Australian News Media. Social Media + Society, [S. l.], v. 7, n. 2, p. 205630512110249, 2021. DOI: 10.1177/20563051211024963.
BORDENAVE, J. O que é comunicação. Editora Brasiliense. São Paulo, 1982.
CARDOSO, T., ALARCÃO, I. & CELORICO, J. Revisão da literatura e sistematização do conhecimento. Porto: Porto Editora.
CARVALHO, Wellington; GUIMARÃES, Ádria Silva. Desinformação, Negacionismo e Automedicação: a relação da população com as drogas “milagrosas” em meio à pandemia da COVID-19. InterAmerican Journal of Medicine and Health, [S. l.], v. 3, p. 0–3, 2020. DOI: 10.31005/iajmh.v3i0.147.
DIFONZO N, BECKSTEAD J W, STUPAK N, WALDERS K. Validity judgments of rumors heard multiple times: the shape of the truth effect. Social Influence, 2016.
EVANS, J. S. B. T., & FRANKISH, K. (2009). In two minds: Dual processes and beyond. Oxford University Press.
FISKE, S. T., & TAYLOR, S. E. (2008). Social cognition: From brains to culture (1 ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
GONÇALVES, Hortência de Abreu; NASCIMENTO, Marilene Batista da Cruz; NASCIMENTO, Kathia Cilene Santos. Revisão Sistemática e metanálise: níveis de evidência e validade científica. Revista Eletrónica Debates em Educação Científica e Tecnológica, [S. l.], v. 5, n. 3, p. 193–211, 2015. Disponível em: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/197150437.pdf.
GUO, Bin; DING, Yasan; SUN, Yueheng; MA, Shuai; LI, Ke; YU, Zhiwen. The mass, fake news, and cognition security. Frontiers of Computer Science, [S. l.], v. 15, n. 3, p. 1–10, 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s11704-020-9256-0.
HODAS, Nathan O.; BUTNER, Ryan; CORLEY, Court; LOUIS, St. How a user ’ s personality influences content engagement in social media. [S. l.], [s.d.].
LAZER, David M. J. et al. The science of fake news. Science, [S. l.], v. 359, n. 6380, p. 1094–1096, 2018. DOI: 10.1126/science.aao2998.
LEWANDOWSKY, Stephan; ECKER, Ullrich K. H.; SEIFERT, Colleen M.; SCHWARZ, Norbert; COOK, John. Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Supplement, [S. l.], v. 13, n. 3, p. 106–131, 2012. DOI: 10.1177/1529100612451018.
LI, Ruohan; SUH, Ayoung. Factors Influencing Information credibility on Social Media Platforms: Evidence from Facebook Pages. Procedia Computer Science, [S. l.], v. 72, p. 314–328, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.146. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.146.
MARTELETO, Regina Maria. Análise de redes sociais - aplicação nos estudos de transferência da informação. Ciência da Informação, [S. l.], v. 30, n. 1, p. 71–81, 2001. DOI: 10.1590/s0100-19652001000100009.
MASSARO, Dominic W.; PETTY, Richard E.; CACIOPPO, John T. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. [s.l: s.n.]. v. 101 DOI: 10.2307/1422805.
NADAREVIC, Lena; REBER, Rolf; HELMECKE, Anne Josephine; KÖSE, Dilara. Perceived truth of statements and simulated social media postings: an experimental investigation of source credibility, repeated exposure, and presentation format. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, [S. l.], v. 5, n. 1, 2020. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-020-00251-4. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00251-4.
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION; NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS. Science and Engineering Indicators: Higher Education in Science and Engineering. National Science Foundation, [S. l.], 2019. Disponível em: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20197.
OLIVEIRA, Edenilton L.; LIMA, Clodoaldo A. M.; PERES, Sarajane M. Fusão de face e forma de andar para reconhecimento biométrico: Revisão sistemática de literatura. SBSI 2016 - 12th Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems: Information Systems in the Cloud Computing Era, Proceedings, [S. l.], p. 108–115, 2016. DOI: 10.5753/sbsi.2016.5952.
PENNYCOOK, Gordon; CANNON, Tyrone D.; RAND, David G. Supplemental Material for Prior Exposure Increases Perceived Accuracy of Fake News. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, [S. l.], v. 147, n. 12, p. 1865–1880, 2018. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000465.supp.
PERLES, João Batista. Comunicação: conceitos, fundamentos e história. … -conceitos-fundamentos-historia. pdf. Acesso em junho …, [S. l.], p. 1–17, 2007. Disponível em: http://www.bocc.ubi.pt/pag/perles-joao-comunicacao-conceitos-fundamentos-historia.pdf.
PROCTER, Rob; VIS, Farida; VOSS, Alex. Reading the riots on Twitter: Methodological innovation for the analysis of big data. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, [S. l.], v. 16, n. 3, p. 197–214, 2013. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2013.774172.
RUTHS, Derek. Social science: The misinformation machine. Science, [S. l.], v. 363, n. 6425, p. 348, 2019. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw1315.
SAMPAIO, RF; MANCINI, MC. Estudos de Revisão Sistemática: Um Guia Para Síntese Criteriosa da Evidência Científica. Rev. bras. fisioter., São Carlos, v. 11, n. 1, p. 83-89, jan./fev. 2007.
SCHEUFELE, Dietram A.; KRAUSE, Nicole M. Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, [S. l.], v. 116, n. 16, p. 7662–7669, 2019. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1805871115.
TOLMIE, Peter; PROCTER, Rob; ROUNCEFIELD, Mark; LIAKATA, Maria; ZUBIAGA, Arkaitz. Microblog Analysis as a Program of Work. ACM Transactions on Social Computing, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 1–40, 2018. DOI: 10.1145/3162956.
TORRES, Claudio. A Bíblia do marketing digital: Tudo o que você queria saber do marketing e não tinha a quem perguntar. [s.l: s.n.].
VENKATRAMAN, Anand; MUKHIJA, Dhruvika; KUMAR, Nilay; NAGPAL, Sajan Jiv Singh. Zika virus misinformation on the internet. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease, [S. l.], v. 14, n. 4, p. 421–422, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2016.05.018. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2016.05.018.
VERCESI, A.; HOGAN, D.; CHAMBOULEYRON, I.; MARTINEZ, J. Os desafios da pesquisa no Brasil. Caderno Temático, Suplemento do Jornal da Unicamp, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 12, p. 1–4, 2002.
WALTZ, Mitzi. Autism: A social and medical history. Autism: A Social and Medical History, [S. l.], p. 1–188, 2013. DOI: 10.1057/9781137328533.
WEBB, Helena; BURNAP, Pete; PROCTER, Rob; RANA, Omer; STAHL, Bernd Carsten; WILLIAMS, Matthew; HOUSLEY, William; EDWARDS, Adam; JIROTKA, Marina. Digital wildfires: Propagation, verification, regulation, and responsible innovation. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, [S. l.], v. 34, n. 3, 2016. DOI: 10.1145/2893478.
WELCH, Vivian; BRAND, Kevin; KRISTJANSSON, Elizabeth; SMYLIE, Janet; WELLS, George; TUGWELL, Peter. Systematic reviews need to consider applicability to disadvantaged populations: Inter-rater agreement for a health equity plausibility algorithm. BMC Medical Research Methodology, [S. l.], v. 12, p. 1–9, 2012. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-187.
ZUBIAGA, Arkaitz; AKER, Ahmet; BONTCHEVA, Kalina; LIAKATA, Maria; PROCTER, Rob. Detection and resolution of rumours in social media: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, [S. l.], v. 51, n. 2, 2018. DOI: 10.1145/3161603.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 RECIMA21 - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar - ISSN 2675-6218
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Os direitos autorais dos artigos/resenhas/TCCs publicados pertecem à revista RECIMA21, e seguem o padrão Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0), permitindo a cópia ou reprodução, desde que cite a fonte e respeite os direitos dos autores e contenham menção aos mesmos nos créditos. Toda e qualquer obra publicada na revista, seu conteúdo é de responsabilidade dos autores, cabendo a RECIMA21 apenas ser o veículo de divulgação, seguindo os padrões nacionais e internacionais de publicação.
