A LOOK AT THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL STATE OF AFFAIRS RECOGNIZED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF BRAZIL

Giliarde B.  A. C. V. Nascimento e Gama

doi:10.47820/recima21.v4i1.2624

Autores/as

Giliarde B. A. C. V. Nascimento e Gama Universidade Federal do Tocantins

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47820/recima21.v4i1.2624

Palabras clave:

factores de múltiples órdenes y tocar el Sistema Penitenciario

Resumen

Abordar factores de múltiples órdenes y tocar el Sistema Penitenciario y Carcelario nacional es buscar comprender las raíces y condicionantes de la estructura formal y jurídica asumida por los establecimientos penitenciarios que, hoy, se reconocen como un “Estado de Cosas Inconstitucional” por decisión, en 2020, en el Alegato de Incumplimiento del Precepto Fundamental n. 347 de la Honorable Corte de la República Federativa de Brasil. En primer lugar, aquí tenemos investigaciones bibliográficas (apoyadas en la literatura de los clásicos políticos y jurídicos, por ejemplo, Immanuel Kant, Norberto Bobbio), documentales ( vg Constituciones de 1824 y 1988, angulares y sustentadas subyacentemente) y jurisprudenciales (Arguição de Descumprimento of Fundamental Precepto - ADPF n.347 sustentado en un constructo jusfilosófico), con enfoque cualitativo e interdisciplinario, sobre el reconocimiento del "Estado de Cosas Inconstitucional" que recaerá sobre el Sistema Penitenciario en Brasil con vistas a la comprensión crítica y reflexiva del ambiente carcelario y los vectores que afirman el “estado de cosas”.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Giliarde B. A. C. V. Nascimento e Gama, Universidade Federal do Tocantins

PhD student in Regional Development at the Federal University of Tocantins –UFT and Master Professor of Law at the State University of Tocantins -UNITINS

Citas

ANDRADE, BA de; TEIXEIRA, MC The unconstitutional state of affairs: an analysis of ADPF 347. Revista do Curso de Direito da Faculdade de Humanidades e Direito, v. 13, no. 13, p. 85-121, 2016.

ARENDT, Hannah. The human condition. Ed. 13 a.m. _ São Paulo: University Forensics, 2016.

ARENDT, Hannah. Men in dark times. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2008.

BOBBIO, N. Dictionary of Politics. Brasília: UnB, 1992.

BOBBIO, Norberto. The Age of Rights. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 1992.

BRAZIL. Law 7210, of July 1984. Establishes the Criminal Execution Law. Available at: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l7210.htm . Accessed on August 1, 2021.

BRAZIL. MANAGEMENT REPORT: supervision of the monitoring and inspection department of the prison system and the system for implementing socio-educational measures - DMF. National Council of Justice – CNJ, 2017. Available at:. Accessed on: 06 Jun. from 2021.

BRAZIL. Report: national survey of penitentiary information. National Penitentiary Department. Available at: http://depen.gov.br/DEPEN/depen/sisdepen/infopen. Accessed on: 06 Jun. from 2021.

CAMPOS, Carlos Alexandre de Azevedo. Unconstitutional State of Affairs. Ed. 2 a . Pituba: Juspodivm, 2019.

CANOTILHO, José Joaquim Gomes . Rule of Law. Fundação Mário Soares.Lisbon: Radiva Produções, Ida, 1st Ed. 1999.

CASTEÑEDA, Ilya Miriam Hoyos. The legal concept of persona. Pamplona: Editions, University of Navarra, 1989.

CELLARD, A. Documentary analysis. In: POUPART, J. et al. Qualitative research: epistemological and methodological approaches. Petropolis, Voices, 2008.

CUNHA, Rogerio Sanches. Criminal Law Manual: general part. Ed. 10 a.m. _ Pituba: Juspodivm, 2021.

DEMO, Peter. Research and construction of knowledge. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 1996.

DUARTE, FC Devices for the clinical listening of suffering at work: Between the clinic of cooperation and pathologies. Dissertation (Master in Social Psychology of Work and Organizations) - University of Brasília. 142f, Brasilia, 2014.

DWORKIN, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Trans. Luis Carlos Borges. 2nd ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2005.

GERHARDT, TE; SILVEIRA, DT Research methods. Porto Alegre: Editora da UFRGS, 2009.

GILL, Antonio Carlos. How to prepare research projects. São Paulo: Atlas, 1991.

GILL, Antonio Carlos. Social research methods and techniques. 6. ed. Publisher Sao Paulo. Atlas, 2008.

GILL, Antonio Carlos. Social research methods and techniques. São Paulo: Atlas, 1999.

GOGLIANO, Daisy. Private personality rights. Thesis (Doctorate in Law) – Faculty of Law, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, 1982.

JUNIOR, CNK (2012). Subject of Law and Capitalism. Thesis (Doctorate in Law) – Faculty of Law. University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo.

JUNIOR, CNK Subject of Law and Capitalism. 2012. 177 f. Thesis (Doctorate in Law) – Faculty of Law. University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo.

KANT, E. Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Translation Paulo Quintela. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2004. 117 p. (Philosophical Texts).

MENDES, AM Analytical Listening to Suffering and the clinician's know-how at work. In: Work & Suffering: clinical practices and policies. Mendes, AM (Org.). Curitiba: Juruá, 2014.

MINAYO, Maria Cecília de Souza. The knowledge challenge. So Paulo: Hucitec, 1993.

MIRANDA, Rafael de Souza. Penal Execution Manual: theory and practice. Ed. 4 a.m. _ Pituba: Juspodivm, 2022.

PENNA, Bernardo Schmidt. More of Brazilian-style judicial activism: analysis of the unconstitutional state of affairs and the decision in ADPF 347. Revista Pensamento Jurídico, v. 11, no. 1, p. 9-19, 2017.

VASCONCELOS, Eduardo Mourao. Complexity and interdisciplinary research: epistemology and operative methodology. Petrópolis, RJ: Voices, 2002.