FROM THE DISCURSIVE EXPOSITIVE EXPLANATORY DIALECTICS VERSUS INFORMATIVE GENRE TO THE IDEOLOGY OF GENRES

Abstract

The textual confusion resulting from an ideological imposition on the text typology introduced mixtures of paradoxical goals as dialogically acceptable, for example, the literary text is dialectical and not paradoxical to the non-literary text even though the characteristics of the first do not exist in the second; it is not a question here of a mixture of normal typologies in a discussion. The characteristics of the literary text are the universality of the theme, verisimilitude, catharsis and metrics (Souza, 2007) which are the same in the world of narration (Bronckart, 2003), narrative (Adam, 1987) and informative expository typology reconfigured to the descriptive typology of Adam (1987) in Pressus (2017). The opinion article that emerged as a textual genre in 2006 through the Opinion Article manual written by Jaqueline P. Barbosa (Didadic Sequence Opinion Article, 2006) as a proposition of public schools in the State of São Paulo brought the paradox and not the principle as a principle. dialectic when Barbosa postulated that arguing is not giving an opinion, then abandoning the term Opinion Article in his future works (Barbosa, 2010). Students in public schools began to confuse opinion with argument and the parallax (Carvalho, 2015) typical of ideological studies began to postulate paradox as dialectic, and so there was confusion from the explanatory expository discourse (argument with evidence facts evidence, not literary ) versus the informative (advertising, publicity, narrative, opinion, literary) until pretending to postulate gender ideology.