FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT VS. SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT: NEW PATHS TO EVALUATE LEARNING AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR STUDENT DEVELOPMENT

Authors

  • Walaci Magnago
  • Állan Stieg Candeia
  • Larissa Valfré Baiôcco
  • Elbert Iesus Veloso Nery da Silva
  • Helicy Loss Pires
  • Girlene Cezar Monteiro
  • Aline Marques Ramos
  • Sabrina Ciríaco Saith Bravim

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47820/recima21.v5i10.5798

Keywords:

Student Development, Summative Assessment, Formative Assessment

Abstract

This article investigates the differences between formative and summative assessment, as well as their implications for student development. Summative assessment, widely used in traditional education systems, measures outcomes at the end of an educational cycle, while formative assessment promotes continuous monitoring of learning. This analysis is justified by the need to understand the impacts of each approach and explore new paths that can integrate both, contributing to a fairer and more inclusive assessment. The research was carried out in educational institutions that adopt both forms of evaluation, through interviews with teachers. The results indicate that summative assessment is effective in measuring results, while formative assessment is more suitable for monitoring progress and adjusting pedagogical strategies during the teaching process. It is concluded that the combination of these approaches offers a robust and balanced alternative to optimize teaching-learning, promoting a more complete development of students. From this analysis, new perspectives for the evaluative practice are proposed, aiming to meet contemporary educational demands.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Walaci Magnago

    Mestrando em Novas Tecnologias Digitais na Educação pelo Centro Universitário Carioca - UNICARIOCA, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Professor da Rede Estadual do Espírito Santo – SEDU.

  • Állan Stieg Candeia

    Mestrando em Tecnologias Emergentes em Educação pela MUST University, Flórida, USA. Professor da Rede Estadual do Espírito Santo – SEDU.

  • Larissa Valfré Baiôcco

    Mestre em Ciência, Tecnologia e Educação – UNIFVC, São Mateus, Brasil. Professora da Rede Estadual do Espírito Santo – SEDU.

  • Elbert Iesus Veloso Nery da Silva

    Licenciatura em Informática – IFES, Linhares, Brasil. Professor da Rede Estadual do Espírito Santo – SEDU.

  • Helicy Loss Pires

    Licenciatura em Pedagogia, UNOPAR, Linhares, Brasil. Professora da Rede Estadual do Espírito Santo – SEDU.

  • Girlene Cezar Monteiro

    Licenciatura em Pedagogia, UNOPAR, Linhares, Brasil. Professora da Rede Estadual do Espírito Santo – SEDU.

  • Aline Marques Ramos

    Licenciatura em Física, UNINTER, Linhares, Brasil. Professora da Rede Estadual do Espírito Santo – SEDU.

  • Sabrina Ciríaco Saith Bravim

    Bacharel em Administração, Faculdade Pitágoras, Linhares, Brasil. Professora da Rede Estadual do Espírito Santo – SEDU.

References

ANDRADE, M. C. Metodologias de Avaliação da Aprendizagem: Aspectos Formativos e Somativos. São Paulo: Editora do Conhecimento, 2010.

BARDIN, L. Análise de Conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2011.

BLACK, P.; WILIAM, D. Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, v. 21, n. 1, p. 5-31, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

BENNETT, R. E. Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, v. 18, n. 1, p. 5-25, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678

FERNANDES, D. Avaliação das aprendizagens: Desafios às teorias, políticas e práticas. Porto: Porto Editora, 2018.

LUCKESI, C. C. Avaliação da Aprendizagem Escolar: Estudos e Proposições. São Paulo: Cortez, 2011.

NICOL, D. J.; MACFARLANE-DICK, D. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning. Studies in Higher Education, v. 31, n. 2, p. 199-218, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

PERRENOUD, P. Avaliação: da excelência à regulação das aprendizagens. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 1999.

SADLER, D. R. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, v. 18, p. 119-144, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714

Published

24/10/2024

How to Cite

FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT VS. SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT: NEW PATHS TO EVALUATE LEARNING AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR STUDENT DEVELOPMENT. (2024). RECIMA21 - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar - ISSN 2675-6218, 5(10), e5105798. https://doi.org/10.47820/recima21.v5i10.5798