CONCILIATORY DEMANDS IN ACCESS TO HEALTH GOODS AND SERVICES: SCOPE REVIEW PROTOCOL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47820/recima21.v3i10.2051Keywords:
Conciliatory lawsuits, Goods and services, Conciliation chambers, AccessibilityAbstract
Objective: to map the existing literature on the production of knowledge and flow about the procedures in conciliatory judicial demands for health goods and services and digital accessibility. Review method: scoping review protocol according to the Joanna Briggs Institute method. Published and unpublished bibliographic materials will be considered, according to the following inclusion criteria: reports on the production of knowledge and flow for procedures in conciliatory judicial demands of health goods and services and digital accessibility (concept) in health conciliation chambers in Brazil and abroad (context). A detailed and individual search strategy will be used for each database: Lilacs (BVS), Medline (PubMed), Embase and Scopus. Two reviewers will screen the titles and abstracts, read the full texts and extract data from the included material. Presentation and interpretation of results: the results included in the scope review proposal will be classified into conceptual analysis categories based on thematic categorical analysis (Bardin's content analysis).
Downloads
References
Schulze CJ, Gebran Neto JP. Direito à saúde. Porto Alegre: Verbo Jurídico; 2015.
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2018; 69(7):467–73. https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-0850.
Silva DMF, Jorge MSB. Mental health care strategies of health professionals in times of COVID-19: scope review protocol. BJHR. 2021; 4(4). https://doi.org/10.34119/bjhrv4n4-270.
Ferreira SMR; Retondario A; Tanikawa L. Protocolo de revisão de escopo e revisão sistemática na área de alimentos. Visão Acadêmica. 2021; 22(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/acd.v22i2.79568.
Araújo W. C. O. Recuperação da informação em saúde: construção, modelos e estratégias. Conv, Ciênc. Inform. 2020; 3(2):100-34. https://doi.org/10.33467/conci.v3i2.13447.
Joanna Briggs Institute. The Joanna Briggs Institute. JBI for evidence synthesis. JBI; 2021.
Botelho RG, Oliveira CC. Literaturas branca e cinzenta: uma revisão conceitual. Ci.Inf, Brasília. 2017; 44(3):501-13. https://doi.org/10.18225/ci.inf..v44i3.1804.
QSR International. O que é o Nvivo?. QSR International; 2020.
Bardin, L. Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Edições 70; 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 RECIMA21 - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar - ISSN 2675-6218
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Os direitos autorais dos artigos/resenhas/TCCs publicados pertecem à revista RECIMA21, e seguem o padrão Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0), permitindo a cópia ou reprodução, desde que cite a fonte e respeite os direitos dos autores e contenham menção aos mesmos nos créditos. Toda e qualquer obra publicada na revista, seu conteúdo é de responsabilidade dos autores, cabendo a RECIMA21 apenas ser o veículo de divulgação, seguindo os padrões nacionais e internacionais de publicação.
