ESCLEROSIS MÚLTIPLE - ENFOQUES DIAGNÓSTICOS Y TERAPÉUTICOS: REVISIÓN BIBLIOGRÁFICA

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47820/recima21.v5i2.4950

Palabras clave:

Esclerosis múltiple. Diagnóstico. Terapia.

Resumen

Introducción: La esclerosis múltiple (EM) es una enfermedad progresiva del sistema nervioso central con una prevalencia mundial cada vez mayor, lo que representa un reto para los pacientes y los profesionales sanitarios. Este estudio pretende abordar las estrategias diagnósticas y terapéuticas recientes para mejorar el manejo de la EM. Objetivo: Proporcionar una visión global de los enfoques diagnósticos y terapéuticos de la EM. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica de los últimos 15 años en bases de datos electrónicas, utilizando criterios de inclusión específicos. Se seleccionaron 15 artículos tras evaluar títulos y resúmenes. Resultados y discusión: Se destacaron el aumento de la incidencia de la EM en todo el mundo y los avances en el diagnóstico, incluido el papel de la resonancia magnética y los biomarcadores. También se abordaron las terapias convencionales y emergentes, haciendo hincapié en la importancia de un tratamiento individualizado y un enfoque multidisciplinar. Conclusión: La investigación y los ensayos clínicos en curso son esenciales para colmar las lagunas de conocimiento. Un enfoque centrado en el paciente, combinado con los avances científicos, promete mejorar la calidad de vida y los resultados clínicos en la EM.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Lucas Mainardo Rodrigues Bezerra

Instituto de Educação Superior do Vale do Parnaíba-IESVAP.

Fernando Akio Yamashita

Acadêmico de Medicina.

Júlia Lorena Lacerda Ferreira Pinho

Acadêmica de Medicina.

Jucimar Milhomem Coêlho Sobrinho

Acadêmico de Medicina.

Caio César Silva Rocha

Acadêmico de Medicina.

Caio Breno Reis Pires

Acadêmico de Medicina.

Gabriel Osaki Queiroz Urzedo

Acadêmico de Medicina.

Cleidson de Morais Silva

Acadêmico de Medicina.

Citas

BAR-OR, Amit et al. Teriflunomide and its mechanism of action in multiple sclerosis. Drugs, v. 74, p. 659-674, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-014-0212-x

BROWNLEE, Wallace J. et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges. The Lancet, v. 389, n. 10076, p. 1336-1346, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30959-X

CLAVELOU, Pierre. Can we optimize our teams? Multidisciplinary care for multiple sclerosis. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, v. 13, n. sup 2, p. 39-44, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1586/14737175.2013.865873

COHEN, Jeffrey A. et al. Alemtuzumab versus interferon beta 1a as first-line treatment for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. The Lancet, v. 380, n. 9856, p. 1819-1828, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61769-3

COMABELLA, Manuel; MONTALBAN, Xavier. Body fluid biomarkers in multiple sclerosis. The Lancet Neurology, v. 13, n. 1, p. 113-126, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70233-3

DENNISON, Laura; MOSS-MORRIS, Rona; CHALDER, Trudie. A review of psychological correlates of adjustment in patients with multiple sclerosis. Clinical psychology review, v. 29, n. 2, p. 141-153, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.12.001

DEVONSHIRE, V. et al. The Global Adherence Project (GAP): A multicenter observational study on adherence to disease‐modifying therapies in patients with relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis. European Journal of Neurology, v. 18, n. 1, p. 69-77, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03110.x

DOBSON, Ruth; GIOVANNONI, Gavin. Multiple sclerosis–a review. European journal of neurology, v. 26, n. 1, p. 27-40, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13819

EVANS, Charity et al. Adherence to disease‐modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis and subsequent hospitalizations. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, v. 26, n. 6, p. 702-711, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4207

FEINSTEIN, Anthony et al. The link between multiple sclerosis and depression. Nature Reviews Neurology, v. 10, n. 9, p. 507-517, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2014.139

FILIPPI, M.; PREZIOSA, P.; ROCCA, M. A. Magnetic resonance outcome measures in multiple sclerosis trials: time to rethink? Curr Opin Neurol., v. 29, n. 3, p. 254-259, 2016.

FILIPPI, Massimo et al. Magnetic resonance techniques in multiple sclerosis: the present and the future. Archives of neurology, v. 68, n. 12, p. 1514-1520, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2011.914

FILIPPI, Massimo et al. MRI criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines. The Lancet Neurology, v. 15, n. 3, p. 292-303, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00393-2

GALLIEN, Philippe et al. Multidisciplinary management of multiple sclerosis symptoms. European Neurology, v. 72, n. Suppl. 1, p. 20-25, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000367620

GIOVANNONI, Gavin et al. A placebo-controlled trial of oral cladribine for relapsing multiple sclerosis. New England Journal of Medicine, v. 362, n. 5, p. 416-426, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0902533

GOLDENBERG, Marvin M. Multiple sclerosis review. Pharmacy and therapeutics, v. 37, n. 3, p. 175, 2012.

HAUSER, Stephen L. et al. Ocrelizumab versus interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis. New England Journal of Medicine, v. 376, n. 3, p. 221-234, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1601277

HAUSER, Stephen L.; CREE, Bruce AC. Treatment of multiple sclerosis: a review. The American journal of medicine, v. 133, n. 12, p. 1380-1390. e2, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.05.049

KALINCIK, Tomas. Multiple sclerosis relapses: epidemiology, outcomes and management. A systematic review. Neuroepidemiology, v. 44, n. 4, p. 199-214, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000382130

LERAY, Emmanuelle et al. Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis. Revue neurologique, v. 172, n. 1, p. 3-13, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurol.2015.10.006

LIBERATORE, G. et al. Predictors of effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment on motor dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, v. 20, n. 7, p. 862-870, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458513508834

LUBLIN, Fred D. et al. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: the 2013 revisions. Neurology, v. 83, n. 3, p. 278-286, 2014.

MARRIE, Ruth Ann et al. The incidence and prevalence of psychiatric disorders in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, v. 21, n. 3, p. 305-317, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458514564487

MCGINLEY, Marisa P.; GOLDSCHMIDT, Carolyn H.; RAE-GRANT, Alexander D. Diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis: a review. Jama, v. 325, n. 8, p. 765-779, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.26858

MONTALBAN, Xavier et al. Ocrelizumab versus placebo in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. New England Journal of Medicine, v. 376, n. 3, p. 209-220, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1606468

ONTANEDA, Daniel; FOX, Robert J.; CHATAWAY, Jeremy. Clinical trials in progressive multiple sclerosis: lessons learned and future perspectives. The Lancet Neurology, v. 14, n. 2, p. 208-223, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70264-9

PAGNINI, Francesco et al. Symptom changes in multiple sclerosis following psychological interventions: a systematic review. BMC neurology, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1-9, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-014-0222-z

PAPEIX, Caroline et al. Evaluation of an integrated multidisciplinary approach in multiple sclerosis care: A prospective, randomized, controlled study. Multiple Sclerosis Journal–Experimental, Translational and Clinical, v. 1, p. 2055217315608864, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2055217315608864

POLMAN, Chris H. et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Annals of neurology, v. 69, n. 2, p. 292-302, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22366

RIETBERG, Marc B. et al. Effects of multidisciplinary rehabilitation on chronic fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. PloS one, v. 9, n. 9, p. e107710, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107710

RÍO, Jordi; COMABELLA, Manuel; MONTALBAN, Xavier. Multiple sclerosis: current treatment algorithms. Current opinion in neurology, v. 24, n. 3, p. 230-237, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0b013e328346bf66

THOMPSON, Alan J. et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. The Lancet Neurology, v. 17, n. 2, p. 162-173, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30168-6

TINTORE, Mar; VIDAL-JORDANA, Angela; SASTRE-GARRIGA, Jaume. Treatment of multiple sclerosis—success from bench to bedside. Nature Reviews Neurology, v. 15, n. 1, p. 53-58, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-018-0082-z

WALLIN, Mitchell T. et al. The prevalence of MS in the United States: a population-based estimate using health claims data. Neurology, v. 92, n. 10, p. e1029-e1040, 2019.

WATTJES, Mike P. et al. MAGNIMS–CMSC–NAIMS consensus recommendations on the use of MRI in patients with multiple sclerosis. The Lancet Neurology, v. 20, n. 8, p. 653-670, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00095-8

WATTJES, Mike P.; RAAB, Peter. Brain and spinal cord MRI in multiple sclerosis: an update. Neurology International Open, v. 1, n. 04, p. E294-E306, 2017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-118111

WILSKI, Maciej et al. Psychological factors associated with self‐management in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, v. 142, n. 1, p. 50-57, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.13236

ZIEMSSEN, Tjalf et al. Optimizing treatment success in multiple sclerosis. Journal of neurology, v. 263, p. 1053-1065, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-015-7986-y

Descargas

Publicado

29/02/2024

Cómo citar

Rodrigues Bezerra, L. M., Akio Yamashita, F., Lacerda Ferreira Pinho, J. L., Milhomem Coêlho Sobrinho, J., Silva Rocha, C. C., Reis Pires, C. B., … de Morais Silva, C. (2024). ESCLEROSIS MÚLTIPLE - ENFOQUES DIAGNÓSTICOS Y TERAPÉUTICOS: REVISIÓN BIBLIOGRÁFICA. RECIMA21 - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar - ISSN 2675-6218, 5(2), e524950. https://doi.org/10.47820/recima21.v5i2.4950

Número

Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2024): HAGA CLIC AQUÍ PARA ACCEDER A LOS ARTÍCULOS

Sección

ARTIGOS

Categorías

Licencia

Derechos de autor 2024 RECIMA21 - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar - ISSN 2675-6218

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

Os direitos autorais dos artigos/resenhas/TCCs publicados pertecem à revista RECIMA21, e seguem o padrão Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0), permitindo a cópia ou reprodução, desde que cite a fonte e respeite os direitos dos autores  e contenham menção aos mesmos nos créditos. Toda e qualquer obra publicada na revista, seu conteúdo é de responsabilidade dos autores, cabendo a RECIMA21 apenas ser o veículo de divulgação, seguindo os padrões nacionais e internacionais de publicação.