SURGICAL PLANNING - 3D VIRTUAL REHABILITATION OF A SEVERELY WORN DENTITION: CASE REPORT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47820/recima21.v6i7.6475Palavras-chave:
CAD/CAM, Digital planning, Parafuncional habits, Dental implantsResumo
This case report presents the successful use of 3D Virtual Surgical Planning-Rehabilitation (3D VSPR) and Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) during provisional and final stages of complex and complete oral rehabilitation treatment in a patient with severely worn-down dentition. This case shows the benefits of facial and intraoral scans to create a digital case model and profile throughout the various stages of implant treatment planning and successful implant placements. The use of such digital advances in Implantology in this case, demonstrates successful long-lasting, esthetic, and functional results after a 24-month follow-up. Using proper healing methods and occlusal splints to control parafunctional habits, this case also shows no further evidence of bone loss, tooth wear, or loss of Vertical Dimension of Occlusion (VDO) in the patient. The approach through a digital workflow for oral rehabilitation of severely worn-down dentition favors a less invasive, accurate, and predictable outcome in complex oral rehabilitation treatment.
Downloads
Referências
[1] Jennes ME, Mehrhof J, Strietzel FP, Schwendicke F, Herbst S, Spies B. Digital treatment planning and prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient suffering from generalized tooth wear. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z Int. 2020;2:73-81.
[2] Van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dental materials. 2012;28(1):3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014
[3] Ochandiano S, García-Mato D, Gonzalez-Alvarez A, Moreta-Martinez R, Tousidonis M, Navarro-Cuellar C, Pascau J. Computer-assisted dental implant placement following free flap reconstruction: virtual planning, CAD/CAM templates, dynamic navigation and augmented reality. Frontiers in oncology. 2022;11:754943. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.754943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.754943
[4] Etajuri EA, Suliman E, Mahmood WAA, Ibrahim N, Buzayan M, Mohd NR. Deviation of dental implants placed using a novel 3D-printed surgical guide: An in vitro study. Dental and medical problems. 2020;57(4):359-362. https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/123976. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/123976
[5] Nikzad S, Azari A, Ghassemzadeh A. Modified flapless dental implant surgery for planning treatment in a maxilla including sinus lift augmentation through use of virtual surgical planning and a 3-dimensional model. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2010;68(9):2291-2298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.02.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2010.02.002
[6] Brief J, Edinger D, Hassfeld S, Eggers G. Accuracy of image‐guided implantology. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2005;16(4):495-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01133.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01133.x
[7] Ganeles J. Image guidance for implants. Image. 2013;9(4).
[8] Tordiglione L, De Franco M, Bosetti G. The prosthetic workflow in the digital era. International Journal of Dentistry. 2016(1):9823025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9823025
[9] Surovas A. A digital workflow for modeling of custom dental implants. 3D printing in medicine. 2019;5(1):9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-019-0046-y
[10] Hall MA, Karawia I, Mahmoud AZ, Mohamed OS. Knowledge, awareness, and perception of digital dentistry among Egyptian dentists: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03698-1
[11] Suganna M, Kausher H, Ali ABMR, Abed MM, Albishi WS, Al Hajji FA, Sultan NA. Knowledge on applications of 3D Design and Printing in Dentistry among Dental practitioners in Saudi Arabia: a questionnaire-based survey. Cureus. 2022;14(8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28379
[12] Radwan HA, Alsharif AT, Alsharif MT, Aloufi MR, Alshammari BS. Digital technologies in dentistry in Saudi Arabia: Perceptions, practices and challenges. Digital Health. 2023;9:20552076231197095. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231197095
[13] Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Bruxism and dental implants: a meta-analysis. Implant dentistry. 2015;24(5):505-516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000298
[14] Zhou Y, Gao J, Luo L, Wang Y. Does bruxism contribute to dental implant failure? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2016;18(2):410-420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12300
[15] Chrcanovic BR, Kisch J, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Bruxism and dental implant failures: a multilevel mixed effects parametric survival analysis approach. Journal of oral rehabilitation. 2016;43(11):813-823. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12431
[16] Shujaat S, Bornstein MM, Price JB, Jacobs R. Integration of imaging modalities in digital dental workflows-possibilities, limitations, and potential future developments. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2021;50(7):20210268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210268
[17] Xing Gao B, Iglesias-Velázquez O, Gf Tresguerres F, Rodríguez González Cortes AF, Tresguerres I, Ortega Aranegui R, Torres J. Accuracy of digital planning in zygomatic implants. International Journal of Implant Dentistry. 2021;7:1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00350-x
[18] Kernen F, Kramer J, Wanner L, Wismeijer D, Nelson K, Flügge, T. A review of virtual planning software for guided implant surgery-data import and visualization, drill guide design and manufacturing. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01208-1
[19] Moro SA, Thomé G, Padovan LEM, da Silva RD, Tiossi R, Fontão FNGK. A zygomatic bone study using virtual dental implant planning software. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2022;48(3):171-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-20-00149
[20] Joda T, Brägger U. Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: a cost/time analysis. Clinical oral implants research. 2015;26(12):1430-1435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12476
[21] Papaspyridakos P, AlFulaij F, Bokhary A, Sallustio A, Chochlidakis K. Complete digital workflow for prosthesis prototype fabrication with double digital scanning: accuracy of fit assessment. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2023;32(1):49-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13492 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13492
[22] Gallardo YR, Bohner L, Tortamano P, Pigozzo MN, Lagana DC, Sesma N. Patient outcomes and procedure working time for digital versus conventional impressions: A systematic review. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2018;119(2):214-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.007
Downloads
Publicado
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 RECIMA21 - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar - ISSN 2675-6218
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Os direitos autorais dos artigos/resenhas/TCCs publicados pertecem à revista RECIMA21, e seguem o padrão Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0), permitindo a cópia ou reprodução, desde que cite a fonte e respeite os direitos dos autores e contenham menção aos mesmos nos créditos. Toda e qualquer obra publicada na revista, seu conteúdo é de responsabilidade dos autores, cabendo a RECIMA21 apenas ser o veículo de divulgação, seguindo os padrões nacionais e internacionais de publicação.
