LITERACY AND LINGUISTIC VARIATIONS

Abstract

In order to conceptualize Literacy and Linguistic Variations, this article infers that a literate person is not always necessarily literate. With regard to the former, it is defined as an individual capable of interacting in society using formal language, while the other, on the other hand, makes use of language informally. The latter is most often influenced by linguistic diversity, which varies depending on social, regional and historical conditions. The article, then, seeks to clarify that the literate person is the person who knows how to read and write; A literate person is one who knows how to read and write, but follows the norm and standard required for reading and writing. The study seeks to clarify the use of written and spoken language, attending to the social environment where it is being applied, avoiding embarrassment in communication. Thus, the aforementioned article goes deep into the interpretation of what is Literacy, Linguistic Variation and its definitions and consequences. The implications caused by the myth between what is Literacy and Linguistic Variations, implying a reflection according to the discussions guided by Marcuschi (2001) and Bagno (2000) in relation to the subject. Linguistic variation caused difficulties in teaching even when it could be defined by areas.