FLUXO DE TRABALHO DIGITAL COM GUIA E PRÓTESE SOBREPOSTOS MAGNETICAMENTE PARA REABILITAÇÃO IMPLANTOSSUPORTADA DE ARCO TOTAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47820/recima21.v4i4.3029Palavras-chave:
Fluxo de trabalho digital, Cirurgia auxiliada por computador, Implante dentárioResumo
A evolução do sistema de escaneamento, melhora na precisão, tornou possível proporcionar aos pacientes maior agilidade nos tratamentos com implantes. Este trabalho tem como objetivo descrever um caso clínico no qual o planejamento protético prévio foi realizado com os cuidados recomendados para permitir a instalação guiada dos implantes em maxila e a instalação imediata, no mesmo tempo cirúrgico, de uma reabilitação de arco total confeccionada previamente em PMMA fresada, em um fluxo totalmente digital, com o sistema magnético de encaixes. Paciente de 64 anos compareceu na Clínica do curso de mestrado da ILAPEO, com queixa de dificuldade mastigatória e estética. Após diagnóstico e planejamento foi proposto reabilitação com implantes superiores e inferiores onde a prótese superior foi realizada totalmente em fluxo digital. Com base na experiência coletada, foi possível concluir que a cirurgia guiada em implantes com instalação de prótese imediata fresada previamente e instalada no mesmo tempo cirúrgico é possível com o sistema de guias empilháveis por magnetos, desde que o planejamento protético prévio seja corretamente executado.
Downloads
Referências
Davidowitz G, Kotick PG. The use of CAD/CAM in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2011;55(3):559-70.
Joda T, Zarone F, Ferrari M. The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):124.
Orentlicher G, Abboud M. Guided surgery for implant therapy. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2011;23(2):239-56.
Divakar TK, Gidean Arularasan S, Baskaran M, Packiaraj I, Dhineksh Kumar N. Clinical Evaluation of Placement of Implant by Flapless Technique Over Conventional Flap Technique. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020;19(1):74-84.
Sunitha RV, Sapthagiri E. Flapless implant surgery: a 2-year follow-up study of 40 implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;116(4):e237-43.
Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Flapless versus conventional flapped dental implant surgery: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e100624.
De Bruyn H, Atashkadeh M, Cosyn J, van de Velde T. Clinical outcome and bone preservation of single TiUnite™ implants installed with flapless or flap surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011;13(3):175-83.
Uhlendorf Y, Sartori IA, Melo AC, Uhlendorf J. Changes in Lip Profile of Edentulous Patients After Placement of Maxillary Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthesis: Is a Wax Try-in a Reliable Diagnostic Tool? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32(3):593–597
Papaspyridakos P, Gallucci GO, Chen CJ, Hanssen S, Naert I, Vandenberghe B. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(4):465-72.
Ji-Hyeon Oh, Xueyin An, Seung-Mi Jeong, Byung-Ho Choi,Digital Workflow for Computer-Guided Implant Surgery in Edentulous Patients: A Case Report,Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,Volume 75, Issue 12, 2017,
Lepidi L, Galli M, Grammatica A, Joda T, Wang HL, Li J. Indirect Digital Workflow for Virtual Cross-Mounting of Fixed Implant-Supported Prostheses to Create a 3D Virtual Patient. J Prosthodont. 2021 Feb;30(2):177-182.
Polizzi G, Cantoni T. Five-year follow-up of immediate fixed restorations of maxillary implants inserted in both fresh extraction and healed sites using the NobelGuide™ system. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(2):221-33.
Varga E Jr, Antal M, Major L, Kiscsatári R, Braunitzer G, Piffkó J. Guidance means accuracy: A randomized clinical trial on freehand versus guided dental implantation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 May;31(5):417-430.
Bover-Ramos F, Viña-Almunia J, Cervera-Ballester J, Peñarrocha-Diago M, García-Mira B. Accuracy of Implant Placement with Computer-Guided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Cadaver, Clinical, and In Vitro Studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(1):101–115.
Pyo SW, Lim YJ, Koo KT, Lee J. Methods Used to Assess the 3D Accuracy of Dental Implant Positions in Computer-Guided Implant Placement: A Review. J Clin Med. 2019;8(1):54.
Seo C, Juodzbalys G. Accuracy of Guided Surgery via Stereolithographic Mucosa-Supported Surgical Guide in Implant Surgery for Edentulous Patient: a Systematic Review. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2018 Mar 31;9(1):e1. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2018.9101. PMID: 29707180; PMCID: PMC5913414.
Marchack CB. CAD/CAM-Guided implant surgery and fabrication of an immediately loaded prosthesis for a partially edentulous patient. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97(6):389-94.
Dolcini GA, Colombo M, Mangano C. From Guided Surgery to Final Prosthesis with a Fully Digital Procedure: A Prospective Clinical Study on 15 Partially Edentulous Patients. Int J Dent. 2016;2016:7358423.
Baruffaldi A, Poli PP, Baruffaldi A, Giberti L, Pigozzo M, Maiorana C. Computer-aided flapless implant surgery and immediate loading. A technical note. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Sep;20(3):313-9. doi: 10.1007/s10006-016-0554-5. Epub 2016 Apr 5. PMID: 27044419.
Bidra AS. Prosthodontic safety checklist before delivery of screw-retained and cement-retained implant restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Jan;119(1):193-194. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.013. Epub 2017 Sep 27. PMID: 28967405.
Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M, Figge D, Edelhoff D, Lümkemann N. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part I. Quintessence Int. 2017;48(5):369-380.
Gallardo YR, Bohner L, Tortamano P, Pigozzo MN, Lagana DC, Sesma N. Patient outcomes and procedure working time for digital versus conventional impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119:214-219.
Ting-shu S, Jian S. Intraoral Digital Impression Technique: A Review. J Prosthodont. 2015;24(4):313-321.
Li H, Lyu P, Wang Y, Sun Y. Influence of object translucency on the scanning accuracy of a powder-free intraoral scanner: A laboratory study. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(1):93-101.
Passos L, Meiga S, Brigagão V, Street A. Impact of different scanning strategies on the accuracy of two current intraoral scanning systems in complete-arch impressions: an in vitro study. Int J Comput Dent. 2019;22:307-319.
Joda T, Zarone F, Ferrari M. The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):124.
Chochlidakis K, Papaspyridakos P, Tsigarida A, Romeo D, Chen YW, Natto Z, Ercoli C. Digital Versus Conventional Full-Arch Implant Impressions: A Prospective Study on 16 Edentulous Maxillae. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(4):281-286.
.Kola M, Rabah A, Raghav D, Sabra S, Harby NM, Khalil H, et al. Surgical templates for dental implant positioning; current knowledge and clinical perspectives. Nigerian Journal of Surgery. 2015;21(1):1.
Siqueira R, Chen Z, Galli M, Saleh I, Wang HL, Chan HL. Does a fully digital workflow improve the accuracy of computer-assisted implant surgery in partially edentulous patients? A systematic review of clinical trials. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020;22(6):660-671.
Kattadiyil MT, AlHelal A, Goodacre BJ. Clinical complications and quality assessments with computer-engineered complete dentures: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(6):721-728.
Varga E Jr, Antal M, Major L, Kiscsatári R, Braunitzer G, Piffkó J. Guidance means accuracy: A randomized clinical trial on freehand versus guided dental implantation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 May;31(5):417-430.
Marković A, Lazić Z, Mišić T, Šćepanović M, Todorović A, Thakare K, Janjić B, Vlahović Z, Glišić M. Effect of surgical drill guide and irrigans temperature on thermal bone changes during drilling implant sites - thermographic analysis on bovine ribs. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2016 Aug;73(8):744-50. doi: 10.2298/VSP141208041M. PMID: 29328609.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Categorias
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2023 RECIMA21 - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar - ISSN 2675-6218
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.
Os direitos autorais dos artigos/resenhas/TCCs publicados pertecem à revista RECIMA21, e seguem o padrão Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0), permitindo a cópia ou reprodução, desde que cite a fonte e respeite os direitos dos autores e contenham menção aos mesmos nos créditos. Toda e qualquer obra publicada na revista, seu conteúdo é de responsabilidade dos autores, cabendo a RECIMA21 apenas ser o veículo de divulgação, seguindo os padrões nacionais e internacionais de publicação.
