VACCINE RESISTANCE: PAST AND PRESENT CONTROVERSIES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47820/recima21.v4i2.2835

Keywords:

Vaccination. Resistance. Historical Context

Abstract

The main objective of this article is to analyze the motivations that drive the resistance of social actors to vaccination, with emphasis on the different sociopolitical contexts of the Vaccine Revolt, in 1904, and the protests arising from extreme right groups in the contemporary context. Therefore, this research has as its main task to underline the discrepancies observed between the prerogatives of the first republicans and the citizens engaged in the 2020 demonstrations, although some confluences can be raised in the vast field of disseminated and vulgarized ideas. With this, the reader can infer that this work does not reiterate the current historical analyzes that place the reactions against the vaccine, manifested in the past and in the present, in the common place of a mere protest engendered by violent sectors of the middle class. In order to safeguard the different circumstances and intentions of social actors inserted in different contexts, some objectives become essential for the unfolding of this study: first, it is necessary to investigate the political and social scenario of the First Republic where the Vaccine Revolt emerged, with the scientific mentality of the time and the authoritarian actions of the government and sanitarians. Then, the reluctance against measures to combat SARS-Cov2, which generates the coronavirus, led by contemporary extremist segments, will be examined, verifying their arguments and political positions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Maxmiliano Martins Pinheiro

IUPERJ (Universidade Candido Mendes).

References

BELLINGHINI, Ruth Helena. “Antivacinas e antiquarentena se encontram no negativismo científico”. Disponível em: revistaquestaodeciencia.com.br/artigo/2020

CARVALHO, José Murilo de. Os Bestializados: o Rio de Janeiro e a República que não foi. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2004.

GOTTSCHALL, Carlos A. M. “Coronavírus: muitos erros, nenhum acerto, e o paroxismo da estupidez”. Disponível em: mises.org.br/article/3264

LACERDA, Gustavo Biscaia de. Laicidade na I República Brasileira: Os Positivistas Ortodoxos. Curitiba: Appris, 2016

MARITAIN, Jacques. A Filosofia Moral. Rio de Janeiro: Agir, 1973.

MENDONÇA, Maria Gusmão de. Progresso e Autoritarismo no Brasil. São Paulo: Pensieri, 1992.

SANTINHO, Renato. “Estudo conclui que imunidade ‘de rebanho natural’ contra Covid-19 é inviável”. Disponível em: olhardigital.com.br/coronavírus/noticia/estudo

TEIXEIRA MENDES, Raimundo. Contra a vacinação obrigatória. Rio de Janeiro: Templo da Humanidade, 1904.

Published

25/02/2023

How to Cite

Martins Pinheiro, M. (2023). VACCINE RESISTANCE: PAST AND PRESENT CONTROVERSIES. RECIMA21 - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar - ISSN 2675-6218, 4(2), e422835. https://doi.org/10.47820/recima21.v4i2.2835